Japan’s government is currently pushing for an “active cyber defense” (ACD) policy, and major media outlets in the country are aiding in the effort by alarming the public. This controversial bill involves state-level spying via private telecom companies on the people of Japan, even in peacetime. The bill also includes supplying information to the United States, leading to suspicions of potential connections with anti-Japan interests in the Chinese Communist Party. The major news outlet, Nikkei, has joined the push for the ACD agenda, promoting greater cyber-attack preparedness and centralized misinformation control, in alignment with nations like the US and UK.
This move towards mimicking surveillance tactics of Five Eyes intelligence giants is concerning for cryptocurrency adoption and privacy in Japan, especially with the introduction of a digital yen. This can potentially threaten the culturally self-reliant populace with more influence from a global banking cabal and pressure to align with foreign figures like Musk and Trump. Despite the knowledge of these potential consequences, politicians like the new prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, continue to push for increased surveillance, indicating a lack of regard for the security and economic freedom of the people they govern. This shift towards surveillance and control can further distance Japan from its once-positive stance on cryptocurrency adoption.
The media in Japan, including outlets like Nikkei, continue to fuel the government’s agenda by promoting increased cybersecurity measures and surveillance. The ACD bill aims to spy on public communications through private companies to prevent cyber attacks and misinformation. This legislation could even involve shutting down people’s computers, raising concerns about privacy and individual freedoms. While the government justifies these measures by citing increased cyber threats to national security, they might be overlooking other pressing issues like inflation, overtourism, and retiree welfare.
The comparison of cybersecurity warnings issued by Japan’s NISC to those of foreign counterparts in the US and the UK reveals a lag in preparedness and response. Rather than focusing on military spending and cyber-security bills, Japanese officials might benefit from addressing issues like aging populations and socioeconomic disparities. The emphasis on surveillance and cybersecurity measures seems to divert attention from more pressing societal challenges. While the number of debunkings issued by Japanese embassies is highlighted as a measure of social progress, real progress should focus on promoting economic freedom and respecting individual rights.
In conclusion, the push for increased surveillance and cybersecurity measures in Japan reflects a concerning trend towards controlling information and infringing on privacy rights. The alignment with major surveillance powers like the US and UK raises questions about the direction of Japan’s policies on cryptocurrency adoption and individual freedoms. As the government prioritizes military spending and cybersecurity bills, important social issues like inflation and retiree welfare might be neglected. It is essential for Japanese officials to prioritize the well-being and economic freedom of their citizens rather than imposing dystopian surveillance measures.
